![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Security design
Oct. 4th, 2016 06:02 amBruce Schneier points out that fixing the user is not a workable policy.
Don’t you feel safer?
May. 16th, 2016 04:00 pmHomeland Security protects us from unethical massages.
Opening wedge
Feb. 18th, 2016 05:43 amFinding a particularly horrible case, as usual, the FBI wants Apple to break its security for them. Bruce Schneier discusses.
When the Department of Homeland Security made us all show our papers to buy Sudafed because NARCOTERRORISM!!! I figured that they wanted crusades against Homoterrorism and Pornoterrorism but figured that even the American public wouldn't buy that one. Once again I was insufficiently cynical. Behold the Rentboy crackdown.
Mere military and intelligence leaders don't understand security risks as well as Republican senators do.
Thanx to Metafilter
Thanx to Metafilter
Don't you feel secure?
Oct. 23rd, 2014 06:07 amHomeland Security: protecting us from panties with team logos they didn't pay royalties on
Quis custodiet
Sep. 30th, 2013 12:53 pmPrivatized national security company said that Edward Snowden and Aaron Alexis were fine fellows.
Thanx to Hal Davis on Facebook.
Thanx to Hal Davis on Facebook.
While the ghost of Ezra Pound laughs
Dec. 3rd, 2012 05:57 amThe Department of Homeland Security's new HQ is an abandoned insane asylum
Thanx to Frank Palmer Purcell on Facebook
Thanx to Frank Palmer Purcell on Facebook
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
From a secret admirer
Oct. 24th, 2011 08:20 pmmash note: a love letter, particularly a hot and steamy one. The future of mash notes is endangered by the internet.--Urban Dictionary
TSA to the rescue!
Sit on this, TSA
Dec. 3rd, 2010 05:34 amBruce Schneier suggests a symbol for the War on the Unexpected.
More on the TSA
Nov. 19th, 2010 08:55 amBruce Schneier has some typically intelligent thoughts on the mess.
Governments and corporations tend to treat "What could go wrong?" as a rhetorical question.
Governments and corporations tend to treat "What could go wrong?" as a rhetorical question.
