Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: A Non-Disparagement Agreement
- 2: American
- 3: Factions
- 4: For the fun of it
- 5: Where is Ramtha when we need him?
- 6: Majority
- 7: Jonah
- 8: Sewermouth
- 9: away along the
- 10: Straightwashing
Style Credit
- Base style: Modish by
- Theme: Verdigris by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2017-09-01 04:41 pm (UTC)OTOH, I thought misleading product names were 100% legal in the US of A. Whether it's an alternate spelling of "chicken" that "obviously" excuses the product from containing meat, or a new name for an old fish, presumably designed to avoid existing (and perhaps well founded) prejudice against it, I read all the ingredient lists, and hope that nothing I care about was quite legally left out of those lists. My housemate wound up vomitting when she failed to check a "juice"s ingredients - she's intolerant of rape seed (canola), and the so-called juice contained canola oil. We both reject a lot of foods for "vegetable oil", "spices," and "a and/or b and/or c and/or d". And eating out is somewhat of a nightmare - just how much sugar is in a seemingly savoury dish (stew, perhaps), and is it enough to upset my pre-diabetic body? Is there canola oil in that stew? Etc.