Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: A Non-Disparagement Agreement
- 2: American
- 3: Factions
- 4: For the fun of it
- 5: Where is Ramtha when we need him?
- 6: Majority
- 7: Jonah
- 8: Sewermouth
- 9: away along the
- 10: Straightwashing
Style Credit
- Base style: Modish by
- Theme: Verdigris by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2017-08-31 05:48 am (UTC)Now, if it was cheese, and 5% nutritional yeast (because the latter was cheaper and didn't make a major change to the flavor), then I'd say that the label was fraudulent. And yeah, the court is suggesting a ruling contrary to reality, but remember, it's a legal doctrine. It was decided that tomatoes were legally a vegetable because of their uses - they are used like vegetables, so it's fair to assume the legislature wanted them taxed like vegetables - that, while humorous, is still a decent *legal* decision. It means the law is sometimes stone-cold stupid, but that's because it's in the service of the people - 'nuff said.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-01 04:19 pm (UTC)Defining
Date: 2017-09-05 09:20 am (UTC)https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-16/the-parmesan-cheese-you-sprinkle-on-your-penne-could-be-wood
Kraft has 3.8% cellulose, and while that falls under the first sentence's vague and unsourced assertion that "an acceptable level" falls in the 2-4% range, Kraft is so bland I don't usually buy it. That leaves me to choose from other brands or store labels that might have even higher amounts of cellulose.
Not to mention "parmesan" is an entirely meaningless name: http://www.seriouseats.com/2016/08/best-parmesan-cheese-parmigiano-reggiano-labeling.html
So it's just cellulose-stuffed "Well, it's a cheese" cheese!