Date: 2016-04-24 06:45 am (UTC)
johnpalmer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] johnpalmer
This research is another example of something that kinda pings out at me. It seems to be trying to draw a deeper view from something that might be cultural. Does every nation have twit-gangs that jump on people who violate social norms?

If not, then talking about "evolution" is stone-cold stupid. I mean, even if every major western nation had gangs of twits, it still wouldn't be time to talk about "evolution." I'll grant it wouldn't be too soon to start thinking about it, to start speculating, but jezum criminy, "and if we could run the same study on medieval serfs, we'd get the same results ,because, dude, *evolution*" is an awfully arrogant position to take, barring time travel.

(I'll admit I didn't dig into the article too deeply. And I wouldn't be a damn bit surprised if certain emotional reactions, like "I'm doing the right, and well-accepted, thing" isn't an evolution thing. And, hey, science JOURNALISM - no science. Still - it bugs me a bit.)

Profile

supergee: (Default)
Arthur D. Hlavaty

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011 1213 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 05:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios