supergee: (platypus)
Arthur D. Hlavaty ([personal profile] supergee) wrote2010-09-14 11:43 am
Entry tags:

Glad to have two identities

[livejournal.com profile] theferrett opposes usernames. If I had one associated with attention whoring, refusing to use cut tags, and encouraging clueless boys to discuss boobs with women they don't know, I might feel likewise. I am fortunate enough not to need the relative anonymity a username provides, but I enjoy having one anyway.

Thanx to [livejournal.com profile] yuki_onna, who discusses good things about usernames.
andrewducker: (Default)

[personal profile] andrewducker 2010-09-14 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Having spent some time arguing through the thread, his problem seems to be with _unique_ usernames on sites. i.e. that LJ can have only one person with a particular username, because this means that a person cannot use the same username, if they so wish, across the internet.

I have some sympathy with that idea - but he put it terribly badly.
thistleingrey: (Default)

[personal profile] thistleingrey 2010-09-14 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
*nods* I suppose that LJ could have unique IDs beneath non-unique usernames, but I notice that FB's customizable usernames are also unique. Why? URLs (e.g. to a particular user's profile) need to be unique; wishing can't change that.

As you say, he has put the idea (whichever one he had, exactly) terribly badly.