Hope

Sep. 9th, 2022 07:54 am
supergee: (coy1)
[personal profile] supergee
I’ve always liked the idea of constitutional monarchy: a separate person occupying the role of Human Exemplar of the Nation, which should not be usurped by the likes of Nixon and Trump. The Exemplar will have flaws, but should be regal.
Now we have King Charles III. There are flaws. I fear there will be a Royal Homeopathist, and while rulers are permitted to have outside affairs, they should not be caught expressing a desire to be a tampon.*
Meanwhile since Brexit (aka Votey McVoteface) the elected government has thrown up (there is more to this sentence) a collection of losers culminating in Liz “Throw Away That” Truss. (https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2022/08/the-gathering-crisis.html)
Charles has shown a certain amount of independent thought. Emperor Franz Josef said that the role of the monarch is to protect the people from the state. Is it too much to hope?
* It could be worse. A slight change of succession, and we would have KING CAUGHT SUCKING TEEN’S TOES.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

supergee: (Default)
Arthur D. Hlavaty

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011 1213 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 10:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios