Date: 2019-03-21 01:59 pm (UTC)
lydy: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lydy
Huh. I have a fairly limited ability to visualize. I was...in my twenties or thirties before I realized that a description of a character with black hair and blue eyes was meant to evoke a visual image, rather than being a description of temperament or character. (I had a complex taxonomy of what hair and eye color meant, and what those combinations meant.) I often have a more kinesthetic understanding of things than a visual one. I was stunned to discover that "Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse" worked for me, even though regular comics mostly don't. and I strongly suspect it was because the images were moving. I once had a terrible argument with a good friend who didn't like a book I suggested because it "had no descriptions." I was baffled. Then he lent me a book, and I couldn't get through the first chapter, because it was entirely a description of the physiognomy and mode of dress of the main character. It was a stupid argument, but really points up how completely oblivious we were to each other's mode of understanding.

Date: 2019-03-21 04:23 pm (UTC)
athenais: (Default)
From: [personal profile] athenais
I had no idea. This information blows my mind. I'm hugely visual, it's how I work with information and remember everything. I wish someone had helped me understand math visually instead of requiring rote memorization without it; I never have been able to carry images of numbers in my head, so I can't do math unless I write it out.

Profile

supergee: (Default)
Arthur D. Hlavaty

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011 1213 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 10:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios