<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:156313</id>
  <title>Arthur D. Hlavaty</title>
  <subtitle>Arthur D. Hlavaty</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Arthur D. Hlavaty</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://supergee.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://supergee.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2016-12-13T11:15:07Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="supergee" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:156313:1829166</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://supergee.dreamwidth.org/1829166.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://supergee.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1829166"/>
    <title>Russian plot</title>
    <published>2016-12-13T11:15:07Z</published>
    <updated>2016-12-13T11:15:07Z</updated>
    <category term="black ops"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">No, I don’t blindly believe the CIA, especially when it’s anonymous “informed sources,” but when the agency whose job it is to look into things like that says that the Russians diddled with the late election, it behooves us to investigate before the Electoral College decides. &lt;a href="http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a51476/russian-hacking-answers/"&gt;Charles Pierce&lt;/a&gt; gets it right, as usual.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=supergee&amp;ditemid=1829166" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
