supergee: (pastafarian)
Arthur D. Hlavaty ([personal profile] supergee) wrote2019-05-16 12:24 pm

Don’t blame the Muslims

Anti-abortion laws are not “Shariah law”. Actually, Shariah is a large and complex system that includes rules protecting workers and the poor, just like parts of Leviticus the Radical Right would rather you didn’t look at.
lavendertook: (islam)

[personal profile] lavendertook 2019-05-16 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes--thank you--needs to be said a lot, especially with Atwood modeling the society in Handmaids Tale more on Islam than Christianity--which is why I've never been a big fan of it. There was no good reason not to frame it on Western Christianity and critique her own house, and we don't need that distraction when it's the fundamentalist Christians taking apart women's rights here.
minoanmiss: A detail of the Ladies in Blue fresco (Default)

[personal profile] minoanmiss 2019-05-17 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Oh huh I didn't know that. The book resonated so hard with my experience of Christianity I didn't know it was supposed to be about oppression stemming from any other religion.
lavendertook: (arwen in library)

[personal profile] lavendertook 2019-05-17 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's an old criticism that maybe is not resonating anymore. I think it was more based on comments Atwood made in the 90's (when I was in grad school) about modeling the dystopia on Islamic regimes and a cautionary extrapolation on where Christianity in the US could go, instead of being not much of an extrapolation of what Dominionists really were envisioning and had been working and voting for. Basically she did the kind of lumping of Islam and Sharia law that supergee is talking about above, perhaps unwittingly--and maybe that's not going on with how The Handmaid's Tale is being interpreted now, Atwood and the critics have moved on, and I'm being an old fogie who should do a reread of the book.